Re: [fxtf-drafts] Update WebIDL definition(s) to use new mixin syntax

The Working Group just discussed `Update WebIDL definition(s) to use new mixin syntax`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: Remove no itnerface object from geometry interface`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Update WebIDL definition(s) to use new mixin syntax<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/233<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: First is webIDL defintions?<br>
&lt;krit> https://www.w3.org/TR/geometry-1/#DOMRectList<br>
&lt;dael> krit: Yes and this is geometry interface modal. It doesn't have an active editor. The spec removed the no interface term and therefore all interfaces need updating. Usually no interface was used for mixins.<br>
&lt;dael> krit: In the future authors should always use sequences of DOM. THe question is why it's a no interface in the first place. THe suggestion was to remove the object.<br>
&lt;dael> krit: Done in FF already.<br>
&lt;dael> krit: My guess is we didn't want JS to create new DOM rec lists with this.<br>
&lt;Chris> sounds good to me<br>
&lt;dael> krit: Web IDL pointed out it should be safe to remove it. I'm asking for approval to change the spec and remove the no interface object from the spec.<br>
&lt;frremy> sounds good to me<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Obj/comments to removing no interface object?<br>
&lt;dael> Chris: sgtm<br>
&lt;Rossen_> +1<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Remove no itnerface object from geometry interface<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/233#issuecomment-360208916 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2018 17:22:53 UTC