- From: Paul LeBeau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:11:38 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
> Wouldn't this be equivalent to not doing the modulo, as the pattern is periodic in width / height anyway? The intention is that it would wrap around for values of `(offsetX % width) != 0`. So `offsetX==0` and `offsetX == width` would look the same. But it would be offset by a 50% at `offsetX == width/2`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by BigBadaboom Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/257#issuecomment-367436775 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:11:41 UTC