Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking-1] Remove requirement to support 'clip' property

> @SebastianZ The CSS WG decided to create a 2nd level of CSS Masking. Is it ok for you to defer the decision to Level 2? Or do you feel strongly that this should be part of CSS Masking Level 1?

Sorry for the long delay! I'm fine with deferring the decision to Level 2.

> `clip` is widely used in code for "visually hidden but screen-reader accessible" styles.

@AmeliaBR Do you have numbers or examples for this statement? Because this sounds like a hacky way of using `clip` (or `clip-path`, for what it's worth). Isn't this rather a case to use the `visibility` property?

Sebastian

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/248#issuecomment-380073514 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 12:00:52 UTC