Tuesday, 30 May 2017
- [fxtf-drafts] [compositing-1] Lighter compositing operator as a blend mode
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [motion] Use 'position: relative' instead of 'opacity: 0' for stacking context descriptions
Monday, 29 May 2017
Saturday, 27 May 2017
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [motion] Interaction of offset-position and shapes
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [motion] Create containing blocks
Friday, 26 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] Why can't opacity() filter function ever increase opacity?
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] Why can't opacity() filter function ever increase opacity?
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] Why can't opacity() filter function ever increase opacity?
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] Why can't opacity() filter function ever increase opacity?
Thursday, 25 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Define "raw geometry" for `<clipPath>` clipping
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Define "raw geometry" for `<clipPath>` clipping
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Define "raw geometry" for `<clipPath>` clipping
- [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] Why can't opacity() filter function every increase opacity
- [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] For filter() image function, do you use intrinsic or extrinsic image dimensions
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [motion] Specify offset-rotate 0deg in examples
- [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] <feFuncX> `type` attribute doesn't have a default
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [motion] Remove Overview.html
Wednesday, 24 May 2017
Monday, 22 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] Are blur parameters to drop-shadow() specifying a "blur radius" or a standard deviation
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] Are blur parameters to drop-shadow() specifying a "blur radius" or a standard deviation
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] "standard deviation" versus "blur radius" in blur() and dropshadow()
- [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] "standard deviation" versus "blur radius" in blur() and dropshadow()
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Update the Changes section
Saturday, 20 May 2017
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Clarify parsing of new DOMMatrix(string)
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking-1] Clarify how mask-mode & mask-composite behave with layered mask images
Friday, 19 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Support <g> element is clipping paths
- [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Define "raw geometry" for `<clipPath>` clipping
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Change percentage value of clip-path
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Change percentage value of clip-path
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Update the Changes section
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Update the Changes section
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Figure out if ClientRect/SVGPoint/SVGRect/SVGMatrix should be aliases
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] 0/-0 equality in "validate and fixup", isIdentity, is2D
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Figure out if ClientRect/SVGPoint/SVGRect/SVGMatrix should be aliases
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Add a Historical section discussing old interfaces
Thursday, 18 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Percentage for clip-path should be n/a or clarification is needed
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Change percentage value of clip-path
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Change percentage value of clip-path
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Change percentage value of clip-path
- [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Change percentage value of clip-path
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Add a Historical section discussing old interfaces
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Use [LegacyWindowAlias] for SVG* and WebKitCSSMatrix
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Use [LegacyWindowAlias] for SVG* and WebKitCSSMatrix
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Figure out if ClientRect/SVGPoint/SVGRect/SVGMatrix should be aliases
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Figure out if ClientRect/SVGPoint/SVGRect/SVGMatrix should be aliases
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Figure out if ClientRect/SVGPoint/SVGRect/SVGMatrix should be aliases
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Add a Historical section discussing old interfaces
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Add a Historical section discussing old interfaces
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] "interface DOMRect" should have alias for ClientRect
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Structured serialization should branch on is 2D
Wednesday, 17 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] Clarify mapping of Cs and Cb to in and in2 in feBlend
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] "interface DOMRect" should have alias for ClientRect
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Treat 0 and -0 as equal throughout
- [fxtf-drafts] [filter-effects] Clarify mapping of Cs and Cb to in and in2 in feBlend
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [motion] Supply size in ray examples
Tuesday, 16 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] "interface DOMRect" should have alias for ClientRect
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier behavior doesn't seem to match implementations
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Structured serialization should branch on is 2D
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Do not structured serialize -0 for m13 of a 2d matrix
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Do not structured serialize -0 for m13 of a 2d matrix
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [motion] defining "computed distance" (aka "used distance")
Monday, 15 May 2017
- [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Structured serialization should branch on is 2D
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier in workers
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Limit DOMMatrix's special stringifier to Window
- [fxtf-drafts] Allow nesting filters instead of using 'in', 'in2' and 'result' attributes
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier in workers
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Treat 0 and -0 as equal throughout
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [motion] none value considerations
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Treat 0 and -0 as equal throughout
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Treat 0 and -0 as equal throughout
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] 0/-0 equality in "validate and fixup", isIdentity, is2D
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] 0/-0 equality in "validate and fixup", isIdentity, is2D
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [motion] Link to Motion Path's size definition
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [motion] computed distance now supports calc
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [motion] Define 'sides' value for ray size.
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [motion] Should omitted <size> just extend to the containing block edge?
Saturday, 13 May 2017
Friday, 12 May 2017
- [fxtf-drafts] [css-masking] Percentage for clip-path should be n/a or clarification is needed
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] 0/-0 equality in "validate and fixup", isIdentity, is2D
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] 0/-0 equality in "validate and fixup", isIdentity, is2D
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Add Privacy and Security Considerations
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Add Privacy and Security Considerations
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Parse as CSS 'transform' instead of SVG transform=""
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Parse as CSS 'transform' instead of SVG transform=""
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Parse as CSS 'transform' instead of SVG transform=""
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Tighten up DOMMatrix's stringifier; throw for NaN/Infinity
- [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] 0/-0 equality in "validate and fixup", isIdentity, is2D
Thursday, 11 May 2017
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Limit DOMMatrix's special stringifier to Window
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Limit DOMMatrix's special stringifier to Window
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier in workers
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] " The IDL in this specification is currently in ..."
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Define serialize/deserialize steps
- [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] "Rectangles have the following properties:"
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier in workers
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier behavior doesn't seem to match implementations
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier in workers
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier in workers
Wednesday, 10 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier in workers
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier behavior doesn't seem to match implementations
- [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrixReadOnly string init depends on backwards compatibility syntax
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier behavior doesn't seem to match implementations
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Remove inline issue about experimental API shape
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Define serialize/deserialize steps
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier behavior doesn't seem to match implementations
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Tighten up DOMMatrix's stringifier; throw for NaN/Infinity
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Tighten up DOMMatrix's stringifier; throw for NaN/Infinity
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Define serialize/deserialize steps
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Define serialize/deserialize steps
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [paint] "outside stroke" and "group outline"
- [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier in workers
Tuesday, 9 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] offset-rotate syntax is resolved
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [motion] offset-rotation should only do path-relative rotation
- [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Clarify parsing of new DOMMatrix(string)
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix stringifier behavior doesn't seem to match implementations
Monday, 8 May 2017
- [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] " The IDL in this specification is currently in ..."
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] stringifier behavior doesn't seem to match implementations
Thursday, 4 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] stringifier behavior doesn't seem to match implementations
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] stringifier behavior doesn't seem to match implementations
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Annotate DOMMatrix's mutable methods with [NewObject]
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: [geometry] Annotate DOMMatrix's mutable methods with [NewObject]
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Usage of 'none' in DOMMatrix transform lists
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix should not depend on the CSS parser
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Usage of 'none' in DOMMatrix transform lists
Wednesday, 3 May 2017
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix should not depend on the CSS parser
- Closed: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Avoid overloading constructor for DOMMatrix
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Use union instead of overload for DOMMatrix/DOMMatrixReadO…
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Use union instead of overload for DOMMatrix/DOMMatrixReadO…
- Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] Use union instead of overload for DOMMatrix/DOMMatrixReadO…
- [fxtf-drafts] Pull Request: offset-rotate syntax is resolved