- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:59:19 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
dbaron has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts: == [css-masking] spec is unclear about how to handle no-clip parsing in shorthand == The [definition of the `mask` shorthand](https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#the-mask) says: > If one <geometry-box> value is present then it sets both mask-origin and mask-clip to that value. If two <geometry-box> values are present, then the first sets mask-origin and the second mask-clip. This sentence doesn't account for the fact that there might be a `no-clip` value. In particular: * `border-box no-clip` has one <geometry-box> but it presumably doesn't set `mask-clip` to `border-box`, contradicting the first sentence * `no-clip border-box` has the same problem, but it also can't just set the first value as `mask-origin` and the second as `mask-clip`. /cc @bzbarsky Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/118 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2017 17:59:26 UTC