W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fxtf-archive@w3.org > June 2017

Re: [fxtf-drafts] [filters-1] Add animation type to properties

From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 02:01:52 +0000
To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-307274875-1496973711-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
e.g. `<feBlend>`'s `in2` attribute? Yeah, that's a bit awkward. There's no standard definition of 'discrete' animation that applies to attributes since Web Animations now specifically supports CSS property animation only.

Part of the reason SVG has `animatable: yet` so often is because of `<set>` animations (i.e. you trigger certain things to happen at different times in a sequence).

Maybe you're best off to just reference SVG 1.1. Any maybe 'yes' is fine for these attributes.

GitHub Notification of comment by birtles
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/32#issuecomment-307274875 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 9 June 2017 02:01:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 November 2018 00:45:58 UTC