W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fxtf-archive@w3.org > December 2017

Re: [fxtf-drafts] Update WebIDL definition(s) to use new mixin syntax

From: Timothy Gu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 06:17:33 +0000
To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-354403595-1514528251-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I think the question is not whether it should be a separate interface, but rather why it shouldn’t have an interface object. Note that having an interface object doesn’t automatically make the interface constructable: you have to explicitly declare `[Constructor]` to do that. See e.g. HTML element classes: they are not (ordinarily) constructable yet they do have an interface object. 

We usually only use `[NoInterfaceObject]` for really special cases where it is necessary (like web compatibility or security concerns). The fact that Firefox is fine without the extended attribute is a sign that it is unnecessary. 

GitHub Notification of comment by TimothyGu
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/233#issuecomment-354403595 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 29 December 2017 06:17:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:21 UTC