- From: Jihye Hong via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:17:43 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
> someone might want to position along a polar ray between the initial point and the edge of the containing block at a non-orthogonal angle. Previously, Motion Path Spec described that the end point of the path is the point where the ray with < angle > meets the edge of the containing block. But this caused the inconsistency in `offset-path` when the < angle > is different but the percentage value of `offset-distance` is the same. So I thought the default value as `closet-side` can solve the inconsistency, it makes the calculated position of the element constant with the changes in < angle > of the path. Specifying `furthest-corner` for < size > can position the element along a polar ray between the initial point and the edge of the containing block at a non-orthogonal angle. It's hard for me to find the better option than `closet-side` for the default of < size >. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jihyerish Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/73#issuecomment-268462882 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2016 08:17:49 UTC