W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fxtf-archive@w3.org > December 2016

Re: [fxtf-drafts] [motion] Should failed references be treated as `none` or as a `0deg` zero-length path?

From: Jihye Hong via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 06:40:30 +0000
To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-264385172-1480660828-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> ray(0deg) is not suitable, because
(a) offset-distance might not be 0.
(b) rotation 'auto' causes a -90deg rotation.

You made a good point.

On second thought, the way to dealing with failed references in 
offset-path should be different in clip-path or shape-outside.

Then, the changes like below are reasonable?
- Failed references is treated as 'path(M10 10)' instead of 'none'
- For the zero-length path, 'offset-rotation: auto' is same as 
'offset-rotation: 90deg'

GitHub Notification of comment by jihyerish
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 06:40:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:20 UTC