On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Matt Woodrow <mwoodrow@mozilla.com> wrote: > > On 22/09/16 11:37 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > > In addition, your proposal *also* affects web content because opacity is > now applied to the group instead of being distributed to the children. > > It's true, but I figured it would be close enough to the old rendering > that the majority of existing content would work with it (assuming they > just want opacity, not specifically opacity distributed to the children) > while also being correct wrt group-opacity and not implementation dependent. > > > >> This thread was started by an author who's content was broken, so it >> seems reasonable to re-visit these assumptions. >> > > Yes, we went over his examples and told him how to fix it (= apply opacity > to the elements) > Since Firefox knows that it's flattening, could it create a warning in the > console and point to an MDN page with more information? > > 1: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/ > blink-dev/eBIp90_il1o/jrxzMW_4BQAJ > <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#%21msg/blink-dev/eBIp90_il1o/jrxzMW_4BQAJ> > 2: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1250718 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1278021 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1229317 > > > I still think that applying group-opacity to a subset of a 3d scene is a > reasonable use case (that can't be easily solved without this), and one > that we could support without breaking anything worse than we already plan > to. > > Doesn't look like this is getting much traction though, so I'll probably > just accept the spec change and go ahead with ship flattening of opacity in > Firefox. > Good to hear! This was a great discussion. If you (or anyone else) can come up with a better solution, maybe we can add it to the spec as another value when we integrate Simon Fraser's proposal.
Received on Friday, 23 September 2016 07:59:26 UTC