- From: Matt Woodrow <mwoodrow@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:06:23 +1200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, /#!/JoePea <trusktr@gmail.com>, Chris Harrelson <chrishtr@google.com>, Simon Fraser <simon.fraser@apple.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On 21/09/16 7:02 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Matt Woodrow <mwoodrow@mozilla.com> wrote: >> This is the core of my point, why should you have to expect it to flatten? >> I've shown that this isn't actually a requirement, only the convenient way >> of handling group opacity > Because otherwise opacity works totally differently in 3d than it does > in 2d, in a difficult-to-explain way. translateZ() and z-index should > work similarly, as they're doing the same thing. > Can you please explain what you mean by this? If you look at my examples, it's still applying the opacity as a group. The difference is that it doesn't flatten preserve-3d, which has no analogue in 2d. - Matt
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2016 08:06:57 UTC