- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:30:39 +0100
- To: public-fx@w3.org, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "Domenic Denicola" <d@domenic.me>
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:58:35 +0100, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: >>>> For DOMMatrix, I guess it makes sense to serialize an array with the >>>> elements. We could either always serialize all of them or only >>>> serialize >>>> 6 elements when is2D returns true. >>> >>> Yeah, I'm not sure what's best here. >> >> OK. Always serializing 16 elements is simpler. > > Went with this for now. I don't remember now why I thought an array made > sense; it can be used for constructing a new matrix but it can't be > passed in directly to e.g. multiplySelf(). Should I change > DOMMatrixReadOnly's serializer to an object? Changed to an object with all attributes in https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/commit/7b5664a99dff3a3c3afd5085c65fea7ad7791d9c -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2016 17:31:11 UTC