- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:44:04 +0100
- To: public-fx@w3.org, /#!/JoePea <trusktr@gmail.com>
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:52:18 +0100, /#!/JoePea <trusktr@gmail.com> wrote: > DOMMatrix.setMatrixValue > <http://www.w3.org/TR/geometry-1/#dom-dommatrix-setmatrixvalue-transformlist> > accepts a DOMString transformList. Why not accept the same things the > constructor accepts (which can be more performant that passing a > DOMString > for parsing)? From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2014AprJun/0118.html it looks like it was added to match MSCSSMatrix and WebKitCSSMatrix. I will note that the constructor for DOMMatrix per the editor's draft is just [Constructor(sequence<unrestricted double> numberSequence)] and then there are a few static methods for other inputs. In particular, we wanted to avoid overloading, and presumably we should avoid that here also. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Monday, 11 January 2016 12:44:36 UTC