On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 7/17/14, 4:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> Adding [ArrayClass] to a few legacy classes >> does not help much. >> > > Well, it gives you map(), foreach(), every(), some(), filter(), reduce(). > > That's not nothing.... It seems to me that in cases when it's > web-compatible, having [ArrayClass] on legacy lists is strictly better than > not having it. Making the legacy DOMRectList an [ArrayClass] wouldn't be web-compatible. IE, WebKit and Blink don't implement it as an array class unlike Firefox. Since this is a legacy interface, why not just specify what everyone has implemented and leave it at that?
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 16:56:43 UTC