On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > Personally I'm leaning towards just making is2D and isIdentity use the > simple definitions that check for exact values of the matrix coefficients, > rather than using state bits. It's a difficult judgement call but the > simplicity and generality probably outweigh the possible downsides. > Maybe we can provide both so people that want consistent behavior, can still call MaybeHasTransform.Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:38:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:49 UTC