On Jun 7, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 7, 2014, at 6:57 AM, "Rik Cabanier" <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > >> All, >> >> is2D [1] is a function that takes no arguments, doesn't change the state and returns a boolean. >> Is there any reason why we can't turn it into a readonly attribute? > What is the benefit and cost for either of both? > > It's likely the same. It just seems like this should be attribute since the function has no side effects when you call it. Most of the informational methods[1] do not heave any side effects and don’t take arguments. I think it looks weird to make some of them attributes. IMO it is easier to understand if we stick to just having m11 to m44, a to f being attributes. We can discuss it on the next call. Greetings, Dirk [1] http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/#informational-methodsReceived on Saturday, 7 June 2014 05:46:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:49 UTC