W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: [geometry] DOMMatrix with DOMString argument

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:32:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDD_DMQuq5qmgYKj0QGkQ4-rLuvC+k6YD97-t1qrn3ACjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: FX <public-fx@w3.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> To summarize:
> 1) Shall we support Element as an optional argument to provide a context for the parser? What about unattached Elements?

Sounds good to me.

> 2) If no Element was passed, what is the fallback for relative of percentage values?

Generally speaking, these types of things are resolved against a 0
length.  I suppose that em/rem/etc should be resolved against the UA
default font and font-size.

Received on Friday, 23 May 2014 21:33:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:49 UTC