Re: Units of time in Web Animations [was: Intent to Ship: Element.animate] from Paul Irish on 2014-04-16 (public-fx@w3.org from April to June 2014)

From: Paul Irish <paulirish@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:19:32 -0700
To: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
Cc: Jeremie Patonnier <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, Douglas Stockwell <dstockwell@google.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, "bbirtles@mozilla.com" <bbirtles@mozilla.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAK-PPf33OvccoJ7OJya151kkcyBzXU9+85=zdpGa0HWCdUhwMw@mail.gmail.com>

>
>
>>
> I'm somewhat surprised by this - why would you ever animate opacity over
> 1ms? Nevertheless, it's a useful data point. Thanks! :)
>

Yeah I was shooting for durations that were "reasonable" when considered in
either ms or s. 1ms does seem impractical, but that didn't stop people from
voting on it.


> The sample size for that survey is ~100 people, correct?
>

Yeah so far.  Tweeted it out of @ChromiumDev to get a wider sample audience
on it.

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2014 23:24:48 UTC