On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Jeremie Patonnier < jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi :) > > > 2014-04-17 0:30 GMT+02:00 Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Domenic Denicola < >> domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: >> >>> Regardless of spec examples, all of the real-world CSS transition and >>> animation code I've seen uses the ms unit, not the s one. I don't think CSS >>> provides any guidance here. >>> >> >> The first three sites I found transitions on use seconds: >> google.com uses 0.1s, 0.5s (not 100ms, 500ms). >> twitter.com uses 0.3s (not 300ms) >> www.smh.com.au uses 0.4s, 0.1s (not 400ms, 100ms) >> > > This is statistically inaccurate. There are millions of web sites out > there. How those three could be representative of all the rest? > I think this is a good counter-point to Domenic's assertion ("all of the real-world CSS transition and animation code I've seen uses [...] ms"). It wasn't intended to be a thorough statistical analysis :) > > >> Literally the first 3 transitions tutorials I found use seconds: >> >> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/CSS/Using_CSS_transitions >> http://css3.bradshawenterprises.com/transitions/ >> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/tutorials/css_transitions >> > > Which does not presume of what users are truly doing. CSS support both > second and millisecond. If both are supported, it's because both are used. > > >> Do you have counter-examples? >> > > Unfortunately, no time now to provide you a list, but basically, all the > web sites my company is working on (we prefer using milliseconds... but I > do not assume our behavior is the general one) > > It would be great if you could provide more accurate statistics. > Seeing some popular websites using milliseconds would be a great indication that there was even contention here... Cheers, -Shane > best > -- > Jeremie > ............................. > Web : http://jeremie.patonnier.net > Twitter : @JeremiePat <http://twitter.com/JeremiePat> >Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2014 22:45:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:49 UTC