W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: review of CSS Masking

From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:55:32 +0000
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CF6D40E8.1A748%stearns@adobe.com>
On 4/11/14, 2:16 AM, "Dirk Schulze" <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:

>On Mar 18, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
>> In this section you should say something about whether the border
>>radius of a given <geometry-box> are also taken into account when a
>><basic-shape> is specified.
>This is not part of CSS Shapes yet.

Yet? I’m assuming that the border radius of a reference box should *not*
be taken into account. The reference box just provides a coordinate system
for a <basic-shape> - I don’t see how the border radii would figure in.



Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 13:56:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:49 UTC