- From: Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:41:49 +0100
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 14:54 -0800, Rik Cabanier wrote: > During last week's call [1] David Baron mentioned that the compositing > and blending specification didn't declare the mathematical operations > as normative. > I went back over when I made this change but couldn't retrace why this > was done (or who told me to do so). > > > I agree with David that this should be declared normative and made > changes to the editor's draft so those section are now normative [2]. > I also updated those sections to clarify what are notes, examples and > required/normative behavior. > > > Does anyone disagree with this change? > If not, I would like to ask for another Last Call on the next SVG and > CSS telecon with a duration of 4 weeks. Sounds good. > In addition, I also > - removed the paragraph on knockout (per Simon Fraser's request) > - removed the section on clip-to-self and references to it (per James > Robinson's and roc's request) > - clarified section on SVG compositing and ordering of examples and > figures (per Tav's request) Examples numbering still skips numbers in Firefox (but not Chrome). 'class=example' occurs both on <div>s and the <img>s inside which appears to mess up the auto-counting. Minor editing quibbles: Abstract: Add period after: * compositing groups. 3.4: <blend-mode> = .... should be broken into two lines so it doesn't run off-screen. Third example: ... element is causing ... -> ... element causes ... 3.4.2: In CSS, a background ... -> A CSS background image or the content of an <img> must... [<img> is HTML, not CSS] Question: what about <iframe>, <object>, <embed>? 3.4.3: Subject/verb agreement: ... blend with the element's background layer that is below it ... OR ... blend with the element's background layers that are below it ... the element instead -> the element, instead 5. Note: Shape either exists at a particular point or it does not. -> A particular point is either inside the shape or it is not. The note should be divided into two paragraphs; one for shape, one for opacity. 10: Blending, example caption: Note ... lowers. -> Note how the rectangle is redder where the opacity of the background is smaller. General: I find the use of <br> in the middle of a <p> makes the spec more difficult to read; for example, in 3.4.2 between the first and second sentence. They should be removed or replaced by <p> depending on how closely the material before and after is related. Tav
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 13:42:36 UTC