On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > The paragraph in question describes a compositing model that is not used >> by canvas or HTML or CSS or SVG any other web technology and that there are >> no plans to use in any web technology. in way way do you think that it >> *is* helpful to have in a web standard? >> > > There are plans. CSS compositing was going to use clip-to-self which is > why it was deferred to level 2; it required too many changes which would > slow down progress. > I think that would be a bad idea, for the reasons in my first reply. > > Even if that was not the case, it's good to call out that there are > different compositing modes and that canvas is using a particular one. > Do it on a blog or in a book or something other than in a web standard spec, in that case. We don't put all text that is potentially useful in specs especially when it's describing behavior that is specifically *never* used on the web. - James > That section of the spec has already come in handy when talking to browser > developers (ie the skia team) and the graphics driver (ie NVidia) >Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 02:48:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:47 UTC