W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: [css compositing]

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:12:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDA3dj9X1XrGHWzNb8gxPa3Gd3pmtwfR6BG1arpdoVxfeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>
Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Hi Tav,

only section 2 and 3 are normative.
The rest of the document describes what compositing and blending is in
general terms.

What makes you think it's meant to apply to SVG?

On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr> wrote:

> I am a bit confused when reading the spec. As I read it, the whole
> discussion of Porter Duff Compositing Operators is irrelevant for SVG,
> only applying to Canvas. Is this correct? The Abstract would lead one to
> think otherwise.
> Also, would it be usefule for the feComposite filter to include all the
> Porter Duff compositing operators?

Apart from 'clear' (which could be done through other means), it seems like
you can implement all PD operators with filters. Which one do you think is
Received on Saturday, 19 October 2013 21:12:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:47 UTC