- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:32:44 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: public-fx@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDCdkCU3VeALyev_aYUrrLpg6serk2hJHAMnvHKSUUaUhA@mail.gmail.com>
mix-blend-mode calls out [1] when it is supposed to happen, but not the other properties. mix-composite is the identical to mix-blend-mode. Isolation is basically about forcing a stacking context. I will update the spec to make this more clear. Rik 1: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/default/compositing/index.html#mix-blend-mode On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:12 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html#csscompositingrules_CSS > says: > > # The application of non-default blending or compositing to an > # element formatted with the CSS box model must also establishe a > # stacking context the same way that CSS βopacityβ does. > > This doesn't defined which properties count for "non-default > blending or compositing". It needs to do so; the spec basically > isn't even understandable without knowing which properties this is > talking about. (In particular, is it referring to just > mix-composite and mix-blend-mode, or also to some or all of > isolation, knock-out, background-composite, or > background-blend-mode?) > > -David > > -- > π L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ π > π’ Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ π > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 20:33:14 UTC