On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:29 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree. The vast majority of people are just interested in the 2d > transform. > > Another issue with 3d is how transform-style [1] is treated. > for intstance: > <div id="a"> > > <div style="transform: rotate3d(...); transform-style: preserve-3d"> > > <div id="b" style="transform: rotate3d(...); transform-style: flat"> > > Does it make sense to transform point between a and b? > > > Sure, I don't see anything wrong with this. Even mapping into an element > with transform-style: preserve-3d is fine; you're just mapping into the > plane of that element. > yeah, preserve-3d is not so bad. I thought 'flat' would be harder to do but maybe not. How do you handle edge cases where a plane becomes a line?Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 04:26:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:44 UTC