- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:57:26 +1000
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- CC: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Dirk Schulze: > Given the fact that a <mask> can rarely be used for both, alpha and > luminance mask, I would be in favor to not change the current > grammar. Authors will define masks for one of the masking types. But we still need to allow the type in the 'mask' property when it is referencing a non-<mask> element, right?
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 02:58:08 UTC