Re: Perlin and simplex noise

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > Actually, what is the problem of copy pasting shaders or use generators?
>> > I think this is more helpful then introducing yet another filter primitive.
>> > We already have enough in my eyes. Introducing more makes it harder to
>> > maintain those - from the spec and the implementor side. I have nothing
>> > against regular used short hands, but another noise filter does not really
>> > fit into this concept in my eyes.
>>
>> The problem is that it's much more difficult to use than a simple
>> function.
>
> If you believe this, maybe we need to fix that.
> It should be possible to make shaders as easy to use as filters...

As easy as *filters*, maybe (but probably not).  As easy as the
*shorthand filter functions*, no, that's impossible.  I was talking
about the latter.


>> Noise is used quite a lot in webpages, but right now it's
>> always done by downloading a noise PNG or whatever.  Making noise
>> available as a primitive would be very useful!
>
> The door was always left open to add more shorthands so if enough people see
> their value, they should be added.
> The filtering model in CSS is not as powerful as SVG (ie you can not
> composite different filters together) so we probably need to add more than
> just the turbulence filter.

The type of noise I'm interested in is sufficient as a plain image.
It would also be useful as a filter function, sure, but I just want to
add a noise() function to the <image> type, and I'll rely on SVG
making a good decision about the type of algorithm to do it with.

~TJ

Received on Monday, 3 September 2012 19:48:44 UTC