- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 08:54:54 -0700
- To: Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-fx@w3.org
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > One further thought based on our discussion of element(). We discussed that > we want to be able to use masks without requiring the <mask> wrapper, e.g. > > <rect id="rect" ... /> > ... > <path mask="url(#rect)" ... /> > > I wonder if it's useful to say that, in order to refer to SVG fragments in > this way you must use the element() syntax. i.e. the url() syntax is only > for <mask>s and other SVG elements which we treat specially, rather than > just rendering them to a buffer (like paint servers). I assumed that was the intention, yes. The "child" and "select()" syntaxes were to be for selecting <mask> children, while the more general <image> type (or whatever you call it in SVG - <pserver>?) was for just creating an image (of which one way is to use element() to select an element that provides a paint source). ~TJ
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 15:55:50 UTC