- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:47:32 +0100
- To: public-fx@w3.org
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:28:36 +0100, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Like described on "Merged Transforms"[1], the parsing behavior between > SVG and CSS differs a lot. To solve this issue, I suggest to extend the > SVG parser for the SVG 'transform' attribute to support the CSS parsing > rules as well. Therefore the syntax of existing SVG content will still > be valid. Currently and future specified transformation functions from > CSS Transform will work for the attribute as well. SVG users can still > use the old syntax for existing and new functions. Unit less values will > still be supported. I would like to add the following section to CSS > Transforms (http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/). The proposed text > is using the same wording style like CSS Values and Units[2]. Do you > accept the proposal? I agree with the analysis, and think that it's a good idea to extend the svg transform attribute syntax so that it's as compatible as possible with the css syntax, while still maintaining backwards compatibility. In other words, I support this proposal. -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 09:48:04 UTC