- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:42:29 +0200
- To: public-fx@w3.org, "Brian Birtles" <birtles@gmail.com>
On Mon, 14 May 2012 01:19:51 +0200, Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com> wrote: > (2012/05/11 17:47), Erik Dahlstrom wrote: > ... >> SVG attributes becoming properties > ... >> ed: third issue, certain things that used to be content in SVG are now >> styleable >> ... e.g. width/height >> ... proposed resolution is to just accept that >> ... implication is that you no longer have to put them in the content >> >> ?: Will it be valid not to specify width/height on an element thenkrit > > Two amendments to the minutes here. Firstly, the above was my comment. > > Secondly, in the meeting Erik and I looked this up and width/height on > rect are REQUIRED, (not IMPLIED). i.e. if they are not specified the > element is invalid. The SVG DTD may need to be updated to support > promoting SVG attributes to properties. > > We discussed this in the meeting but it didn't make the minutes. > > Best regards, > > Brian Birtles In that conversation I also mentioned that in SVG Tiny 1.2 the width and height on rect are optional. -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 07:43:07 UTC