Re: Some practical issues integrating the SVG transform attribute with CSS transform properties from Robert O'Callahan on 2011-03-25 (public-fx@w3.org from January to March 2011)

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 10:45:26 +1300
To: Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de>
Cc: public-fx@w3.org, Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikEtxB7cDdjUaStdKL2TkPrOEGzKeeoxkNsnr_R@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de> wrote:

> I thought that previous telcons already decided to take 1a? Nevertheless
> I'd agree to 1a, this is downward compatible to already existing webpages
> using CSS Transform. Would it be possible to switch to the behavior of CSS
> for SVG 2.0? Or should SVG 2.0 be downward compatible to  1.x in this case?
> I bet most SVG's out there are affected by such a decision if they do not
> provide a version number.
>

We should not introduce version-dependent behavior to SVG, that would be a
disaster.

Option 1a, then.

Rob
-- 
"Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for
they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures
every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11]

Received on Friday, 25 March 2011 21:54:57 UTC