- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:52:01 -0700
- To: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com> wrote: > I'd like to keep it as a simple 'filter' property applying to the element, rather than a content thing. It's so basic that it is easily understood. Agreed. > I agree that the filter() function is also useful for generating images. > > Should this new function be defined in the Filters spec, or the Images spec? It seems most natural for this to be defined in Filters. Just define it as a type of <image>, and accepting an <image> as its first argument, with a reference over to Image Values. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 23:52:48 UTC