- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:06:48 +0100
- To: public-fx@w3.org
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Hello,
Minutes of the 22 November FX taskforce call are here
http://www.w3.org/2010/11/22-fx-minutes.html
and below in text for tracker to harvest.
- DRAFT -
CSS-SVG Task Force Teleconference
22 Nov 2010
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2010OctDec/0060.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2010/11/22-fx-irc
Attendees
Present
+1.650.253.aaaa, TabAtkins, heycam, [IPcaller], ed, Shepazu,
ChrisL, anthony
Regrets
simon
Chair
Erik
Scribe
ChrisL, TabAtkins
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]public-fx-editors
2. [6]task force specs
3. [7]Maintenance / progress
4. [8]CSS3-UI pointer-events
5. [9]Publishing resolutions and WG communication
6. [10]CSS3-UI pointer-events
* [11]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 22 November 2010
<ChrisL> scribenick: ChrisL
<scribe> Agenda:
[12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2010OctDec/0060.ht
ml
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2010OctDec/0060.html
public-fx-editors
ed: logs cvs changes
<ed> [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx-editors/
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx-editors/
ed: for entire fx taskforce area on dev.w3.org
cm: am i on?
cl: will chec
... no you weren't
task force specs
ed: see agenda, only 2d transforms is committed so far and the
editors anre not here
... sounds like 2d transforms is ready to publish
<ed> [14]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/charter/
[14] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/charter/
ed: charter mentions other specs too
cm: what is the status?
ds: at tpac it was clarified that css wg, being larger and with only
a subset of members on the tf, publication decisions need separate
ratification
cl: anything which is in scope for both charters can be worked on by
agreement
ds: svg has most members on the tf so does not need separate
ratification
ed: anthony, what is the expected date for publication on 2d?
ag: some changes needed before publication, and simon has an action
about api comparisons
... and a way to get back the trasform value, which is not a matrix
... glazou wanted a human readable transform list
... or we could publish as is and add more stuff later
ed: is it ok to publish now
ag: needs an intro and some red bits removed, before fpwd
... minor edits then publish
... css wg was keen to move forward. just needs some cleanup here
and there
cl: suggest making the edits first then making a publication
decision
ag: estimate two weeks for edits, another week for examples so 3
weeks
ed: so around 13 december
... (adds as due date to wiki)
... this would be fpwd
... filters module is closer to publication. will move over to fx
space then incoproprate roc proposal
... some work already to allow that to be used in css/html but needs
more definition
cl: due date?
ed: aim for an editors draft around 20 december
... for the other specs I think we are waiting for dean to propose
the animation model, maybe someone from microsoft also had an action
cm: on the list, moz request animation frame was brought up
... seems a reasonable fit for webapps
ds: appropriate for this group as well
cm: hmmm
ds (link to webapps discussion)
tab: point is to sync with animation
<shepazu>
[15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010OctDec/06
44.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010OctDec/0644.html
cm: not just to syn with declarative animation, also to allow purely
user written animations to not hog the cpu
ds: yes it hooks into refresh rates
... its all about animation
... need to have a suitable api to make that work
cm: no preference where it goes
ds: good to have discussion in multiple places to get more feedback
... in terms of charters its in scope of svg wg charter
... but not webapps
... css has animation in scope as well, not explicitly scripting
though
... can alert that list to this discussion
ed: looking forward to seeing the proposals
cm: mentioned to dino interested in helping out with unified
animation model. he plans to add a wiki page
Maintenance / progress
ed: looking through tracker, we have three open issues with no
actions
issue-1?
<trackbot> ISSUE-1 -- Consider not adding transformRef to Transforms
spec -- raised
<trackbot> [16]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/track/issues/1
[16] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/track/issues/1
ed: no actions for this
ag: not on my list. did we discuss at tpac?
ed: definitely an issue, is it important or can we live without?
... need sa note in the spec that its an issue
<scribe> ACTION: anthony to add a note to 2d transforms with issue
on transformRef [recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2010/11/22-fx-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-22 - Add a note to 2d transforms with
issue on transformRef [on Anthony Grasso - due 2010-11-29].
issue-2?
<trackbot> ISSUE-2 -- Need to figure out how transitions affect a
transform on an element that has an animation running on it --
raised
<trackbot> [18]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/track/issues/2
[18] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/track/issues/2
simon says "I don't understand this Issue."
tab: who raised it?
ed: raised in telcon
ag: its a transitions issue
... dbaron said there wwere some bugs with transitions affecting
transforms, so the transitions chapter was removed from the fx 2d
spec
ed: so the issue could be closed then?
ChrisL: better to close and re-open a more specific issue that is
better documented
<TabAtkins> ScribeNick: TabAtkins
cm: A metapoint - I saw Siomon's notes on this issue, and Patrick
put some notes on other actions/issues, and I wonder if that's not a
good use of Tracker, because it doesn't send out emails.
... Perhaps it should be the other way around - send emails to the
list and have tracker pick them up automatically.
ChrisL: Agreed.
ed: Last open issue is #3, about writing mode values across CSS and
SVG.
<ed> issue-3?
<trackbot> ISSUE-3 -- writing-mode values across CSS and SVG --
raised
<trackbot> [19]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/track/issues/3
[19] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/track/issues/3
ag: I'm not sure what this issue is about really.
TabAtkins: It's just a harmonization issue between the two versions
of writing-mode.
<ChrisL> scribenick: chrisl
<TabAtkins> ag: SVG picked a bunch of writing modes a while back,
and fantasai was trying to pick something out that made more sense.
ed: to agree on the set of values, not much problem for svg side
cm: seen one of the rtl in inkscape output. or was it the ttb one
... not much content that iuses it
ed: ok to drop some if that is what we decide
... can we assign an action to this, and if so what?
cl: original problem description is clear, so its just a case of
doing it
ds: will raise an issue on svg2
... while grumbling
ed: pity tracker has no move or duplicate functionality
<shepazu> [20]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2392
[20] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2392
CSS3-UI pointer-events
<ed>
[21]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2010OctDec/0058.ht
ml
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2010OctDec/0058.html
Publishing resolutions and WG communication
ed: we need to be careful to minute resolutions and to ensure the
parent groups are well informed
cm: tantek did not seem to see the tf work as on scope
tab: the css wg is large enough that css wg is not on the radar for
everyone
ds: disappointed we don't have adobe here
tab: szilles is not directly involved with css implementation. was
talking with some authoring-related adobe employees. will prod them
to join
ed: should ee communicate the milestone dates now, or when edits are
done
cm: does tf stuff get discussed?
tab: only 2.1 stuff at the moment.
cm: worried that there is not enough communication
ChrisL: agree, but its 100% on css 2.1 at the moment
CSS3-UI pointer-events
ed: some discussion and a few issues raised
... and kevinr asked some questions too
... should css3 spec be what svg references in the future, or would
it diverge?
ChrisL: copy pasting from svg 1.1 into css3 ui is a bad idea, it
should normatively reference for svg-specific details
ed: there are issues raised,
<ed> [22]http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-ui
[22] http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-ui
ChrisL: seems tantek accepts on issue 6, and is just waiting for a
reference to use
ed: ok
<scribe> ACTION: erik to send normative links for fill and stroke
[recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2010/11/22-fx-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-23 - Send normative links for fill and
stroke [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-11-29].
ed: can we resolve this?
resolved: css3 ui should reference svg spec for svg specifics, uris
will be provided
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: anthony to add a note to 2d transforms with issue on
transformRef [recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2010/11/22-fx-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: erik to send normative links for fill and stroke
[recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2010/11/22-fx-minutes.html#action02]
[End of minutes]
___________________
--
Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain
W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 22:08:15 UTC