On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de> wrote: > Am 25.10.2010 um 22:48 schrieb Robert O'Callahan: > > > Maybe I'm missing something, but for "transform-origin" you don't define > what the "bounding box" for an element in the CSS box model is. I guess from > the CSS draft, it's "the element's CSS box" --- which is quite different in > spirit to the SVG bounding box which "entirely encloses the element and its > descendants". Maybe this should be noted; it's probably going to confuse > authors. Or we could resolve the discrepancy by defining a new kind of SVG > bounding box that only bounds the element and not its descendants, and > defining transform-origin in terms of that. > > What would the new bounding box look like for containers, if we don't take > descendants into account? > Yeah, good point. The SVG model, where all the visible content is at the leaves, is just different. The spec still needs to be clarified though. Rob -- "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11]
Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 21:16:03 UTC