- From: Kevin Ar18 <kevinar18@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:47:04 -0400
- To: <schepers@w3.org>, <public-fx@w3.org>
Although you were replying to someone else, thanks for the heads up on the situation.... and the deadline (about 2 weeks from now). At this point, I'm thinking that I'll probably try and write up a more complete and thorough proposal that covers certain issues I had regarding event handling. I hope that this would be considered a good thing? :) > We will try to correct the inconsistency at our next SVG F2F in Paris, > just after SVG Open. We'd be happy to talk with you more about the > ... > I mentioned this earlier, but you may have missed it. The SVG WG is > presently on hiatus (because of various vacations, implementation > crunches building up to product release, presentation and demo > development, conference travel, and other disruptions) until SVG Open. > So, there's only so much bandwidth we have to respond. > > > Just as a clarifying note: even when we are active, the SVG WG may be > slow to respond to comments on the list. It's not because we don't > value the feedback, is that there are only a few of us, and we are all > doing many other things. > > Just to bring this into perspective... > In addition to helping manage the SVG WG, I do the same for the very > large WebApps WG; I monitor many SVG community lists, exchange quite a > lot of private SVG emails, act as a sort of developer outreach person as > the activity lead for our Rich Web Clients activity, and deal a lot with > W3C members' issues; I write charters and try to help foster new work > and new vendor participation (I'm trying to get web education, audio > read-write, and touch interface activities going at W3C right now); I > review a lot of specifications, and I'm editing at least 4 > specifications right now, including the rather demanding DOM3 Events, > which we are trying to bring to Last Call; I also try to write blog and > twitter posts to bring the larger community into the conversation of > creating and maintaining SVG; and I've been speaking at several > conferences to try to spread SVG goodness. > ... > But like I've said before on this thread, the SVG WG will be discussing > the issue soon, taking into account the contents of these threads, and > we will come back to the community with our resolutions. If there is > some problem at that time, we'll discuss it and work to resolve it.
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 2010 23:47:36 UTC