- From: Kevin Ar18 <kevinar18@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:19:13 -0400
- CC: <public-fx@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SNT110-W54BB7FBFF54206F34C990AA820@phx.gbl>
> >> I would just say that the <svg> element is considered a replaced > >> element as far as its surrounding contents are concerned, and any > >> CSS values set on it apply exactly as if applied to a replaced > >> element. And note that in some cases those values may also affect > >> the SVG, e.g. 'color' will inherit into the SVG content. > > > > Would this apply equally for both referenced SVG and inline SVG? > > Yes. CSS should be handling both exactly the same. (The SVG, given > the additional style information, might behave slightly differently > within its viewport, however.) To be clear I am referring to the svg element (not object, embed, image, etc...) As far as I can tell, HTML5 does not consider the SVG element to be this kind of replaced content: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/rendering.html#replaced-elements hmm that might completely change the logic my earlier argument/post I made > > > Where would the right place to reference in the most recent appropriate > > draft of which CSS spec? > > Reference CSS2.1. > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#replaced-element > > ~fantasai >
Received on Monday, 23 August 2010 16:19:46 UTC