- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:18:00 +0100
- To: "Doug Schepers" <doug@schepers.cc>, "Dean Jackson" <dino@apple.com>
- Cc: anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au, public-fx@w3.org
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:51:45 +0100, Doug Schepers <doug@schepers.cc> wrote: > Hi, Dean- > > Dean Jackson wrote (on 2/25/10 1:36 PM): >> >> On 25/02/2010, at 2:26 PM, Anthony Grasso wrote: ... >>> While deciding on what the deliverables should be, we should take >>> into account that CSS is applicable to SVG and HTML and that SVG >>> may also be applicable HTML in the future in certain cases. Either >>> the first or second option might be the way to go. That said, I >>> have no strong opinion as long as we can justify the option we >>> decide to take. >> >> FWIW, we want to implement CSS Transforms on SVG content in WebKit. > > Awesome. I'd like to see that implemented in Opera as well. > What are the next steps? Should we take a straw poll to see if everyone > is on board with option 1 (single spec with both syntaxes), and then > draft it up and put it in CVS? A single spec sounds like the best option to me. Cheers /Erik -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 21:18:49 UTC