- From: Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 03:53:16 -0500
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Cc: public-fx@w3.org
This looks like just an artifact of the merging process. The current CSS 2D transforms working draft lists skew(<angle> [, <angle>]), but it's been eliminated in the latest editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/csswg/css3-2d-transforms/Overview.html?rev=1.12#transform-functions 2010/5/11 Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>: > Hello public-fx, Anthony Grasso, > > this is a comment about > http://dev.w3.org/Graphics-FX/modules/2D-transforms/spec/2DTransforms.html > (from today) > > > As already mentioned in the CSS list about the corresponding draft about > CSS transforms, it is not obvious, what skew(<angle> [, <angle>]) > means: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Dec/0039.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Dec/0046.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Dec/0124.html > > Would be nice to see a matrix representation or a composition of > several basic, already defined transform for this - and this should > really fit to the name skew and should not be an arbitrary transformation > not related to the name skew ;o) > > Another option would be of course to skip it. I think, this was already > proposed somewhere from someone in a teleconference? > > > Olaf > > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 08:53:49 UTC