- From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:22:55 -0700
- To: public-forms@w3.org, "public-xformsusers@w3.org" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
All, I added more examples to this. Here is the diff: https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XPath_Expressions_Module&diff=4050&oldid=4044 And the text: https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XPath_Expressions_Module#URI_Functions -Erik On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org> wrote: > All, > > I added spec text for the new URI functions. Here is the diff: > > https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XPath_Expressions_Module&diff=4042&oldid=3947 > > and the direct link to the section: > > https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XPath_Expressions_Module#URI_Functions > > I would like to review and add examples for all functions. I have only > added a few examples so far. > > Feedback welcome, > > -Erik > > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org> wrote: >> All, >> >> Following our last call, the idea was to change the approach to the >> following: >> >> - provide one function to access the document location >> - provide general-purpose URL destructuring functions >> >> The proposal becomes as follows: >> >> This function returns a URI representing the location of the document: >> >> xf:location-uri() as xs:anyURI >> >> (This is expected to be an HTTP or HTTPS URL for practical purposes.) >> >> The following functions all take a URI as first parameter, and return a >> specific part. The various parts are inspired by the Java URI class, which I >> think is reasonable: [1] >> >> xf:uri-scheme($uri as xs:anyURI) as xs:string? >> xf:uri-scheme-specific-part($uri as xs:anyURI, $raw as xs:boolean) as >> xs:string? >> xf:uri-authority($uri as xs:anyURI, $raw as xs:boolean) as xs:string? >> xf:uri-user-info($uri as xs:anyURI, $raw as xs:boolean) as xs:string? >> xf:uri-host($uri as xs:anyURI) as xs:string? >> xf:uri-port($uri as xs:anyURI) as xs:integer? >> xf:uri-path($uri as xs:anyURI, $raw as xs:boolean) as xs:string? >> xf:uri-query($uri as xs:anyURI, $raw as xs:boolean) as xs:string? >> xf:uri-fragment($uri as xs:anyURI, $raw as xs:boolean) as xs:string? >> >> Each function may not return a given component, in which case it returns the >> empty sequence. >> >> Some of these functions take an optional $raw parameter [2], which defaults >> to `false()`. When $raw is `true()`, the value is returned "without >> interpreting any escaped octets". >> >> The following two functions, which were the ones initially desired, are >> added: >> >> xf:param-names($uri as xs:anyURI) as xs:string* >> xf:param-values($uri as xs:anyURI, $name as xs:string) as xs:string* >> >> They only return a non-empty sequence for hierarchical URIs which have a >> query part. The first one returns all parameter names, possibly with >> duplicates, in the order in which they appear. The second one returns all >> parameter values for a given parameter name, in the order in which they >> appear. >> >> Alternatively, these two functions could apply directly to a query string, >> rather than to a URI. >> >> Examples: >> >> 1. Get the current path: >> >> xf:uri-path(xf:location-uri()) >> >> 2. Get the first "foo" URL parameter: >> >> xf:param-values(xf:location-uri(), 'foo')[1] >> >> I think the above would be pretty comprehensive as far as figuring out URI >> parts. >> >> One question is whether to standardize all of this directly in XForms, or to >> request broader feedback, for example from EXPath [3]. >> >> Feedback welcome, >> >> -Erik >> >> [1] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/net/URI.html >> [2] Which in XPath means each function has two versions. >> [3] http://expath.org/ >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org> wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> Here is my list of proposed functions related to the page location >>> (browser) or request information (server). >>> >>> I think, at the very least, we would like something to help with query >>> parameters. Something like: >>> >>> xf:parameter-names() as xs:string* >>> xf:parameter-values($name as xs:string) as xs:string* >>> >>> We can go further and provide access to more details of the location: >>> >>> Entire URL: >>> >>> xf:location-url() as xs:anyURI >>> >>> URL parts, following mostly : >>> >>> xf:location-protocol() as xs:string >>> xf:location-host() as xs:string >>> xf:location-port() as xs:string >>> xf:location-path() as xs:string >>> xf:location-query() as xs:string >>> xf:location-hash() as xs:string >>> >>> (The browser has "pathname" instead of "path", and "search" instead of >>> "query". Those sound a bit antique and odd.) >>> >>> Server implementations are not expected to be able to provide >>> `xf:location-hash()`, as that is known by the client only. >>> >>> In addition, the following username/password are possible but of >>> dubious utility: >>> >>> xf:location-username() as xs:string >>> xf:location-password() as xs:string >>> >>> On the client, this would be available if you have: >>> >>> http://foo:bar@example.org/ >>> >>> At this point it seems (not verified) that only Firefox supports >>> username/password. On the server, this would translate into obtaining >>> the username/password of a BASIC authentication, which may or may not >>> be available. >>> >>> On naming: >>> >>> 1. We could use a common prefix, e.g. `location-` for all. But >>> `xf:location-parameter-names()` and `xf:location-parameter-values()` >>> become very long in that case. >>> >>> 2. We could also use a different namespace URI for what we would call >>> a "request" or "location" module. >>> - Pros: shorter names, like `l:port()`, and a clearer sense of >>> modularity >>> - Cons: a new namespace, and people don't like namespaces. >>> >>> Feedback welcome! >>> >>> -Erik
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2014 01:30:56 UTC