W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Inconsistent description of attributes on <label> etc.

From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:37:46 +0200
To: "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, "Erik Bruchez" <erik@bruchez.org>
Cc: "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.xd1208wysmjzpq@steven-ux21a>
But not <alert>?

Steven

On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:05:17 +0200, Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org> wrote:

> Yes, it should be UI Common.
>
> The idea was, for hint and label, to support `appearance="minimal"`.
> There is an example for hint in the spec:
>
>     <hint appearance="minimal">Last, First</hint>
>
> It does make sense to have this too:
>
>     <label appearance="minimal">
>
> Like for hint, the label should/could then be rendered as a
> placeholder. Maybe the spec should provide an example too.
>
> -Erik
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Steven Pemberton
> <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:
>> Section 8.1
>> https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_XForms_Core_Form_Controls_Module
>> says that <label> etc have as attribute sets: Common, Single Item  
>> Binding
>> (author-optional)
>>
>> But section 8.2.1
>> https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#ui-commonelems-label
>> says that they have Common Attributes: Common, UI Common, Single Item
>> Binding (author-optional)
>>
>> So which is right? Can you say <label appearance="full"> or not?
>>
>> Steven
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2014 15:38:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:10 UTC