- From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:01:50 +0200
- To: public-forms@w3.org, "public-xformsusers@w3.org" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
All, Looking at what's on my plate (or might end up on it), I see: 1. ACTION-1933 - Suggest spec text for MIP functions The valid() function is already there. [1] What's missing is adding the functions to access the other MIPs, relevant()/required()/readonly(). That should be pretty easy. 2. ACTION-1896 - Send a e-mail to Michael Kay about providing type information to the nodes in instances This is an old action item. The original question I think is obsolete, but the new question on this is whether it is reasonable to compile XPath expressions without knowing *any* node types, but to provide those types at runtime when the expression runs. I think it should be, but it'd be good to double-check. 3. Integrate xf:dialog spec I don't think there is an action item on this one, but we had decided to do it. There is a resolution for show/hide [2], but no action item. We need one. 4. ACTION-1948 - Provide spec text for multipart This is a late-minute feature, but we discussed it and I was under the impression I could write up something "quickly". 5. ACTION-1868: Bruchez to summarize problems with error handling and three options for variable type handling This is an older action item, and I had it on hold. Not sure what to do with it right now, clearly a P2 for now. I don't know about other people's action items. Finally, I am pretty sure some of the XForms 2 text hasn't been reviewed (at least by me). -Erik [1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XPath_Expressions_Module#The_valid.28.29_Function [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/01/30-forms-minutes.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 15:02:45 UTC