Nick,
I'm sorry to cause trouble, but I thought we had consensus about
xf:upload/@accept. But reading
http://www.w3.org/2013/02/06-forms-minutes.html I realize we had no
official approval. So, of course we should discuss this topic today.
That being said, I don't see problems editing the Wiki. We have
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XForms_2.0&action=history
and
can always revert changes.
Regards,
Uli.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Nick Van den Bleeken <
Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com> wrote:
> I have a remark not related to the text itself. But I find it really
> dangerous to propose text in the live specification. In wiki land you don't
> have something like branches and so all modifications are made in the same
> version, which makes it impossible to know if the change is 'approved' by
> the group or not.
>
> Certainly in this late stage in the process I would __not__ recommend
> making changes to spec that aren't editorial or backed with a
> resolution/consensus.
>
> Could we discuss this during the call?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Nick Van den Bleeken
> R&D Manager
>
> Phone: +32 3 425 41 02
> Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71
> nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com
> www.inventivedesigners.com
>
>
>
> On 13 Feb 2013, at 13:51, Ulrich Nicolas Lissé <unlisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Group,
>
> i completed https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/1931.
> Please review
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XForms_2.0&diff=3775&oldid=3774
> .
>
> Regards,
> Uli.
> --
> Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
> http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
>
--
Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
