- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 06:56:11 -0700
- To: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
- Cc: Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFCC03AF3A.422F6AAB-ON88257A08.004B73B2-88257A08.004C9088@ca.ibm.com>
This looks great, Nick. It is a little hard to tell whether green versus yellow means change versus add (the norm for W3C) or whether green means add and yellow means change (the norm for normal people who relate the color to what has conceptually happened). For example, the eval() and eval-in-context() shows up mostly green, but it is added content, not changed content. Functions like parse and serialize are added, but are yellow. Similarly, the pre-existing examples in adjust-dateTime-to-timezone() have added words that showed up in green, and a whole new example that showed up yellow. Again, I don't think the distinction matters much since an addition is just a special kind of change, and so having color in the right places is what's important, and so I think it's good to go. If you're showing diffs relative to 1.1 content, then maybe the diff marking around the editors seems reversed :-) Not to do with this document in particular, but I'm surprised W3C still let's red and green be used for diff marking, given emphasis on accessibility. Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnboyerphd Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw From: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com> To: Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org> Date: 24/05/2012 02:30 AM Subject: XForms expression module diff version All, I managed to re-create a base version for the XForms Expression module and use this as a base for the diff version. I decided to not mark the change in notation of the function attributes as a change, because this isn't a real change but only a syntax change. You can find the live diff version at http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FMarkUp%2FForms%2Fwiki%2FXPath_Expressions_Module_base&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FMarkUp%2FForms%2Fwiki%2FXPath_Expressions_Module any changes made to wiki spec will be reflected in the diff version. Could all group members have a look at the differences and decide if they agree with those changes so we can advance this document and the XForms core document to FPWD. Thanks in advance, Nick Van den Bleeken R&D Manager Phone: +32 3 425 41 02 Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71 nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com www.inventivedesigners.com PS: I'm not completely happy with the diff marking (e.g.: the eval functions sections), but this is the best I could get it. Also be warned that the coloring schema isn't what you would expect (change: yellow, new:lime), for the FPWD version we can change the colors in the css if we want to. Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 13:58:07 UTC