- From: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:15:43 +0000
- To: "Leigh L. Klotz Jr." <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- CC: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org>, "<public-xformsusers@w3.org>" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3C0FEED3-B1E6-4056-AEE6-14BDB3386FEC@inventivegroup.com>
Leigh, I've updated the relax-ng and xml schema. But if you'd like to review the changes that would be nice. This https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xformsusers/rev/153bae3cf078 is the relevant change set. If you have time, it would be great if you could review my other changes to the the schemes https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xformsusers Kind regards, Nick Van den Bleeken R&D Manager Phone: +32 3 425 41 02 Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71 nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com<mailto:nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com> www.inventivedesigners.com [cid:image001.png@01CBF2F8.1DA19110][cid:image002.png@01CBF2F8.1DA19110][cid:image003.png@01CBF2F8.1DA19110] On 14 Jun 2012, at 00:40, John Boyer wrote: Ah, thanks, I doubt it. Nick mentioned the XML schema at one point, but it might have been for context and not model... John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com<mailto:boyerj@ca.ibm.com> Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnboyerphd Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com<mailto:Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>> To: John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA Cc: Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org<mailto:public-forms@w3.org>>, <public-xformsusers@w3.org<mailto:public-xformsusers@w3.org>> Date: 13/06/2012 03:31 PM Subject: RE: Added context everywhere (by adding it to the binding attributes) ________________________________ I meant I will try to get to the RNC schema updates to align with the spec, unless someone else hasdone it. Leigh. ________________________________ From: John Boyer [mailto:boyerj@ca.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:27 PM To: Klotz, Leigh Cc: Public Forms; public-xformsusers@w3.org<mailto:public-xformsusers@w3.org> Subject: RE: Added context everywhere (by adding it to the binding attributes) Hi Leigh, Do you mean just that you will try to get to reading the changes? We did already change the spec to reflect these. I'm just letting you know that we did some good fixes as a result of your feedback. So you don't have to do anything more... unless you see a place where we need to make any further fixes. Thanks again, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com<mailto:boyerj@ca.ibm.com> Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnboyerphd Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com<mailto:Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>> To: John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA Cc: Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org<mailto:public-forms@w3.org>>, <public-xformsusers@w3.org<mailto:public-xformsusers@w3.org>> Date: 13/06/2012 03:24 PM Subject: RE: Added context everywhere (by adding it to the binding attributes) ________________________________ I will try to get to these changes. ________________________________ From: John Boyer [mailto:boyerj@ca.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:28 AM To: Klotz, Leigh Cc: Public Forms; public-xformsusers@w3.org<mailto:public-xformsusers@w3.org> Subject: Re: Added context everywhere (by adding it to the binding attributes) Hi Leigh, Further response to this line of inquiry: - Yes context goes everywhere, so we moved it to the Common group - As a result, the model attribute had to be moved to the Common group, which applied model in places not previously applied - The bind element is explicitly restricted to binding to the current model, if the model is expressed, to avoid cross-model computation dependencies. - The header and var elements are not restricted in terms of the model to which they can bind as they are like actions, which are not restricted from referring to another model. - As Nick previously responded, model and context apply to any kind of binding. - Actions such as rebuild, recalculate, revalidate, refresh and reset were amended to remove model as a special attribute, since it is in Common. The text was changed to use the model of the inscope evaluation context instead, along with a Note indicating that the model attribute could be used to change the context. - Actions and their children/descendants, such as dispatch and its children, get context and model. For example, it is at least feasible (if not terribly useful) to get the dispatch name from the data of one model and the dispatch targetid from the data of another model. Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com<mailto:boyerj@ca.ibm.com> Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnboyerphd Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw From: Leigh L Klotz Jr <leigh.klotz@xerox.com<mailto:leigh.klotz@xerox.com>> To: public-xformsusers@w3.org<mailto:public-xformsusers@w3.org> Cc: Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org<mailto:public-forms@w3.org>> Date: 20/04/2012 04:16 PM Subject: Re: Added context everywhere (by adding it to the binding attributes) ________________________________ There is still a distinction between single-node binding: @model, @ref, @bind and sequence-binding (formerly nodeset) binding @model, @ref, @nodeset, @bind In that single-node-binding is used on label, hjelp, hint, alert, message, item/value, item/copy, upload/filename, upload, output, output/mediatype, input, textarea, secret, select,select1, range, trigger, submit, load, setvalue, group, switch, and sequence-binding is used on itemset, insert, delete, repeat. Q: Does @context go on both single-node-binding and sequence-binding? Q: Also, does @context go in any of the following places, which currently have @nodeset, @ref, or @model: header, bind other actions (rebuild, dispatch, send, setfocus, etc) var Leigh. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. ________________________________ Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
- image/png attachment: image002.png
- image/png attachment: image003.png
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 06:16:18 UTC