- From: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:35:39 +0000
- To: Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <40804920-666C-4E8F-A35D-70B7E63083C7@inventivegroup.com>
All, I've added an example about repeating over atomic values. I also added wording to explicitly say that we support repeating over an arbitrary sequence of items. The items in the repeat collection can be either nodes, atomic values or a mix of them. The nodes in the repeat collection don't have to be in document order, and the same node can occur multiple times in the repeat collection. (this is a consequence of XPath 2.0 sequences, but I thought that it was a good idea to make it explicit) I also added wording to the evaluation context to say what happens when your context item is not a node I added variants of 'If the context item is a node, it will also be the context node. If it is not a node, there will be no context node: that is, any attempt to reference the context node will result in a fatal exception ([[#evt-bindingException|xforms-bind-exception]] or [[#evt-computeException|xforms-compute-exception]]).' to the relevant bullets. You can review the change at: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XForms_2.0&diff=3700&oldid=3696 Kind regards, Nick Van den Bleeken R&D Manager Phone: +32 3 425 41 02 Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71 nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com<mailto:nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com> www.inventivedesigners.com [cid:image001.png@01CBF2F8.1DA19110][cid:image002.png@01CBF2F8.1DA19110][cid:image003.png@01CBF2F8.1DA19110] ________________________________ Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
- image/png attachment: image002.png
- image/png attachment: image003.png
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 13:36:10 UTC