- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:18:00 -0700
- To: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
- Cc: "<public-forms@w3.org>"<public-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF8C9712D6.D7397594-ON882579E4.00595D9E-882579E4.00598A81@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Nick, Yes, I agree, but there is already an editor note indicating that we need further consideration of how much control over serialization we want to add, including the suggestion that we want to consider relevance pruning as a value-add over xpath 3.0's serialize() but also all the other options characterized by various attributes of XForms submission, such as the XML Decl. So, that editor note/this email should become an agenda item for a future telecon. Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnboyerphd Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw From: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com> To: John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA Cc: "<public-forms@w3.org>" <public-forms@w3.org> Date: 18/04/2012 07:28 AM Subject: Re: Added initial draft of xf:serialize() to expression module Hi John, I was making another pass through the expression module and while re-reading your editorial notes, I wondered if the XML declaration is serialized. don't we need the same parameters as on the submission to specify the output parameters. Kind regards, Nick Van den Bleeken R&D Manager Phone: +32 3 425 41 02 Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71 nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com www.inventivedesigners.com On 18 Apr 2012, at 08:34, John Boyer wrote: Initial draft of xf:serialize() appears here: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XPath_Expressions_Module#The_serialize.28.29_Function This was a Category:XForms20 feature: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/Parse_and_serialize_functions It was suggested to make it compatible with XPath 3.0 serialize(), The result is compatible, but not identical. It is intended to be parallel to the parse() function and parallel to XForms submission, including serialization to non-XML formats. The differences are explained in an editor note, which will be fodder for discussion. Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnboyerphd Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Attachments
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 16:18:45 UTC