- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:39:36 -0700
- To: public-forms@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 18:40:41 UTC
Just to further articulate the regex pattern issue, note that basic validation can be achieved with a type MIP and a simpleType definition in the model, as shown here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2010Sep/0038.html However, an XPath 2.0 style function matches() would still be useful in a constraint MIP and moreover, an XPath 2.0 style function replace() would be equally handy. We are often hitting a situation where we want to match a regex and then reorganize the information based on the group matches within that regex. Cheers, John
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 18:40:41 UTC