- From: Charles F Wiecha <wiecha@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:23:59 -0500
- To: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Cc: public-forms@w3.org, public-forms-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF0BF7AE5D.FCF87D14-ON852576CF.0065051E-852576CF.006512B9@us.ibm.com>
Hi Erik -- yes, we'll be meeting at the IBM/Lotus location at 1 Rogers St,
Cambridge, MA...Charlie
Charles Wiecha
Multichannel Web Interaction
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
P.O. Box 704
Yorktown Heights, N.Y. 10598
Phone: (914) 784-6180, T/L 863-6180, Cell: (914) 282-3483
wiecha@us.ibm.com
From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
To: public-forms@w3.org
Date: 02/19/2010 01:22 PM
Subject: Re: First face to face: Re: Proposed Charter for the Forms Working Group (Call for Review) sent
Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org
Charlie,
Can you confirm the exact location if already known?
Thanks,
-Erik
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
wrote:
Thank you, Charlie. There wasn't an info page I could find so I created
this one:
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/FtF_2010_03_24_Agenda
(From http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/FaceToFace )
If you have the location information please put it in.
Thanks,
Leigh.
From: Charles F Wiecha [mailto:wiecha@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 9:41 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: John Boyer; public-forms@w3.org; public-forms-request@w3.org; Steven
Pemberton
Subject: RE: First face to face: Re: Proposed Charter for the Forms
Working Group (Call for Review) sent
Yes...still March 24-26 in Cambridge...Charlie
Charles Wiecha
Multichannel Web Interaction
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
P.O. Box 704
Yorktown Heights, N.Y. 10598
Phone: (914) 784-6180, T/L 863-6180, Cell: (914) 282-3483
wiecha@us.ibm.com
Inactive hide details for "Klotz, Leigh" ---02/19/2010 12:38:42 PM---I
see the resolution was to continue with the FtF, but I d"Klotz, Leigh"
---02/19/2010 12:38:42 PM---I see the resolution was to continue with the
FtF, but I don't see any details. Given the closeness
From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
To: "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, "John Boyer" <
boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-forms@w3.org>
Date: 02/19/2010 12:38 PM
Subject: RE: First face to face: Re: Proposed Charter for the Forms
Working Group (Call for Review) sent
Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org
I see the resolution was to continue with the FtF, but I don't see any
details.
Given the closeness of the date, it's going to be difficult for me,
especially without specifics.
Were the exact dates decided at the teleconference?
Thank you,
Leigh.
-----Original Message-----
From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Steven Pemberton
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 7:32 AM
To: John Boyer; Steven Pemberton
Cc: public-forms@w3.org
Subject: Re: First face to face: Re: Proposed Charter for the Forms
Working Group (Call for Review) sent
Hi John,
I'm beginning to get cold chills over the closeness of the chartering and
the FtF, and I would be much happier if we could put the FtF off,
especially now that Uli can't come.
Let's talk about this this afternoon.
I asked PLH if there are any issues about working 'between charters' and
he says that the old charter applies until the new one kicks in.
Steven
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:56:33 +0100, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Steven (and Leigh),
>
> I guess when we started talking about this, I thought the whole vote
> to recharter and new group formation would happen in the January
timeframe.
> Now that I'm seeing that the call for review of the proposed charter
> is going to proceed until March 11, I am starting to become concerned
> about the schedule for our next face to face.
> It seems like W3 management will look at the results for another week
> or two after, then there'll be a call for participation for a few
> weeks after that, then we'd need to give any new people a month's
> notice...
>
> Should we be scheduling the face to face a little later, once the new
> charter is in place and new membership set?
>
> BTW, has our current charter actually been extended? If not, are
> there any IP implications we need to be worried about?
>
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
> STSM, Lotus Forms
> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab
> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
>
> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
> Blog RSS feed:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
> "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
> To:
> public-forms@w3.org
> Date:
> 02/15/2010 03:11 AM
> Subject:
> Proposed Charter for the Forms Working Group (Call for Review) sent
>
>
>
> In case you missed it:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2010JanMar/0024.htm
> l
>
> Get your AC reps to reply.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Steven
>
>
>
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Friday, 19 February 2010 18:24:34 UTC