- From: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:20:25 +0200
- To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, "public-forms@w3.org" <public-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <98F519CDC2FA6146AE00069E9A1D91FD5D700F8AE5@erganix.dc.intranet>
Hi John, I've corrected the error in the stylesheet that generates the reports and also updated the test results of EMC's Formula XForms processor (report provided by you in a separate e-mail). I comitted everything to the w3c site (test report of EMC and results overview). An updated version can be found at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2008/XForms11ImplReports/results.htm Regards, Nick Van den Bleeken R&D Manager Phone: +32 3 821 01 70 Office Fax: +32 3 821 01 71 Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com<mailto:Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com> http://www.inventivegroup.com<www.inventivegroup.com> From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Boyer Sent: donderdag 30 juli 2009 20:01 To: public-forms@w3.org Subject: Please fix implementation report ASAP Had a preliminary call with W3 mgmt to discuss XForms 1.1 changes. Tried to show a particular change, the targetref attribute. Surprisingly, Chapter 11 is missing from the implementation report!!! Embarassing. Can we please get the implementation reports regenerated as soon as possible with Chapter 11 included? Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- ________________________________ Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --
Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 08:21:37 UTC