public-forms@w3.org from February 2009 by date

Saturday, 28 February 2009

• Re: separator default for urlencoded-post versus application/x-www-form-urlencoded Erik Bruchez
• separator default for urlencoded-post versus application/x-www-form-urlencoded John Boyer
• Moved actions inside the model for all Appendix B tests Nick Van den Bleeken

Friday, 27 February 2009

• A possible newsletter John Boyer

Thursday, 26 February 2009

• Updated list of action items 2009-02-26 Nick Van den Bleeken
• XF11 test suite updates Nick Van den Bleeken
• Question about action item Action 2009-02-25.6 and 11.9.4.b. Nick Van den Bleeken

Wednesday, 25 February 2009

• Re: Ability to suppress rebuild-recalculate-revalidate-refresh on submission completion Erik Bruchez
• Ability to suppress rebuild-recalculate-revalidate-refresh on submission completion John Boyer
• Draft minutes for 2009-02-25 Leigh L. Klotz, Jr.
• Re: TELECON AGENDA - 25 Feb 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: Updated list of action items 2009-02-21 Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
• TELECON AGENDA - 25 Feb 2009 John Boyer
• Test for using submission to validate data John Boyer
• Test for relevance pruning before validation John Boyer

Monday, 23 February 2009

• RE: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method Klotz, Leigh

Sunday, 22 February 2009

• It seems I misread the spec regarding SOAP bindings Erik Bruchez
• Same content-type issue for 11.11.3.e Erik Bruchez
• Issue with test 11.11.3.b Erik Bruchez
• Issues with test 11.11.2.a Erik Bruchez
• Issue with test 11.11.1.a Erik Bruchez

Saturday, 21 February 2009

• Updated list of action items 2009-02-21 Nick Van den Bleeken
• Re: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method Mark Birbeck
• Error in test 7.11.2.b ? Nick Van den Bleeken
• RE: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method Klotz, Leigh
• RE: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method Klotz, Leigh
• RE: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method John Boyer

Friday, 20 February 2009

• RE: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method Klotz, Leigh
• RE: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method John Boyer
• RE: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method Klotz, Leigh
• RE: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method John Boyer
• RE: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method Klotz, Leigh
• Re: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method John Boyer

Thursday, 19 February 2009

• Re: 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method Erik Bruchez

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

• Fw: Assessing interest in November W3C Tech Plenary/AC Meetings Week (response needed by 18 March) John Boyer
• 1.1 spec correction for unspecified submission method John Boyer
• Draft minutes for 2009-02-18 Leigh L. Klotz, Jr.
• RE: Leaving the Working Group Nick Van den Bleeken
• Re: TELECON AGENDA - 18 FEB 2009 Erik Bruchez
• Re: TELECON AGENDA - 18 FEB 2009 Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
• TELECON AGENDA - 18 FEB 2009 John Boyer

Tuesday, 17 February 2009

• Re: Question about lazy authoring Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
• Re: Leaving the Working Group Mark Birbeck
• Re: Question about lazy authoring Mark Birbeck
• Re: Leaving the Working Group Erik Bruchez
• Re: Question about xforms:instance @src/@resource and inline instance Erik Bruchez
• Re: Question about lazy authoring Erik Bruchez
• Leaving the Working Group Keith Wells
• Implementation/test case triage (latest) Keith Wells
• Re: Issue with test 10.3.j Erik Bruchez
• Re: Issue with test 10.3.j Keith Wells
• Re: Update needed for 4.7.c [was: RE: Question about lazy authoring] Keith Wells
• Update needed for 4.7.c [was: RE: Question about lazy authoring] Nick Van den Bleeken
• Re: Issue with test 10.3.j John Boyer
• Re: Question about lazy authoring John Boyer
• Re: Question about xforms:instance @src/@resource and inline instance John Boyer
• Question about xforms:instance @src/@resource and inline instance Erik Bruchez

Monday, 16 February 2009

• Re: Question about lazy authoring Erik Bruchez
• Re: Test Case Changes Erik Bruchez
• Re: Test Case Changes Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
• Test 3.3.2.h and use of xforms:output/xforms:label without binding/value Erik Bruchez
• Issue with test 10.3.j Erik Bruchez
• Re: Found some more errors in the XF 11 test suite Keith Wells
• Test Case Changes Keith Wells
• Question about lazy authoring Nick Van den Bleeken
• Found some more errors in the XF 11 test suite Nick Van den Bleeken

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

• Implementation/test case triage (per review 2009-02-05 thru 2009-02-10) Keith Wells

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

• Implementation/test case triage (per review 2009-02-05 and 2009-02-09) Keith Wells
• Test Case Changes for tests passing on NO implementations Keith Wells

Monday, 9 February 2009

• Minutes Virtual FtF, 5 February 2009 Steven Pemberton
• Revised Face to face agenda Feb 2009 John Boyer

Friday, 6 February 2009

• Re: Any objections or concerns about styles for common spec features? Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Fwd: Any objections or concerns about styles for common spec features? Steven Pemberton

Thursday, 5 February 2009

• Re: Updated Face-to-Face Agenda Steven Pemberton
• Updated Face-to-Face Agenda John Boyer

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

• Strawman XForms Data Layer spec Charles F Wiecha
• Re: Bugs in XForms 1.1 Test Suite Section "10. XForms Actions" Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
• Re: AGENDA: Feb 2009 Face to Face Meeting of the W3C Forms WG (first draft) Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
• Re: Question about the XForms 1.1 test suite related to if() Erik Bruchez
• Question about the XForms 1.1 test suite related to if() Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com
• Problems in XForms 1.1 test suite Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com
• Re: Action: Test Cases passing only 1 implementation John Boyer
• Re: Action: Test Cases passing only 1 implementation Keith Wells
• TELECON AGENDA: 04 Feb 2009 John Boyer

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

• Re: Action: Test Cases passing only 1 implementation John Boyer
• RE: AGENDA: Feb 2009 Face to Face Meeting of the W3C Forms WG (first draft) John Boyer
• RE: AGENDA: Feb 2009 Face to Face Meeting of the W3C Forms WG (first draft) Klotz, Leigh
• AGENDA: Feb 2009 Face to Face Meeting of the W3C Forms WG (first draft) John Boyer
• 5 Actions dones John Boyer
• XForms 1.1 editor draft updated again John Boyer
• Web page news and table of deliverables updated John Boyer
• Re: Location/address Forms FtF @ google Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com
• Regrets for this week's call as well as the virtual day Erik Bruchez

Monday, 2 February 2009

• Re: Location/address Forms FtF @ google Steven Pemberton
• Location/address Forms FtF @ google Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com
• Updated list of action items 2008-02-02 Nick Van den Bleeken
• 4 Actions done, 1.1 spec updated, test suite impact John Boyer

Sunday, 1 February 2009

• Action for all: Web conferencing with Yugma and Unyte John Boyer

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 18:45:30 UTC